The claim of his widow was filed in the Pension Bureau in 1885, ten
years after her husband's death, and is still undetermined.
The fact that her application is still pending in that Bureau is
sufficient reason why this bill should not become a law.
A better reason is based upon the entire lack of any facts shown to
exist which entitle the beneficiary named to a pension.
GROVER CLEVELAND.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, _June 22, 1886_.
_To the Senate_:
I return herewith without approval Senate bill No. 1192, entitled "An
act granting a pension to Alfred Denny."
It appears that the claimant entered the United States military service
as captain and assistant quartermaster of volunteers on the 12th day of
June, 1863. After remaining in such position for less than a year he
resigned to accept a civil position.
The short record of his military service discloses no mention of any
accident or disability. But twenty years after his resignation, and on
the 12th day of March, 1884, he reappears as an applicant for a pension,
and alleges in his declaration filed in the Pension Bureau that in
August, 1863, while in the line of duty, he was, by a sudden movement of
the horse he was riding, thrown forward upon the horn of his saddle and
thereby received a rupture in his right side, which at some time and in
a manner wholly unexplained subsequently caused a rupture in his left
side also.
Pages:
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262