On
one occasion he said; "I take it for an axiom that there exist
interests common to every nation comprised within the boundaries of
the same civilization. I take it equally for certain that among these
common interest none is of higher importance than the principles of
international law." Nor did he hesitate to say that our indifference
to the spread of "absolutism" would be attended with serious and
grievous consequences: "To look indifferently at these encroachments
is as much as a spontaneous abdication of the position of a power on
earth. And that position abandoned, is independence abandoned." He
declared that neutrality did "not involve the principles of
indifferentism to the violation of the law of nations"; and he
attempted to stimulate the national pride by the declaration that
neutrality was the necessity of weak states, like Belgium and Switzer-
land, whose neutrality was due the rivalry of other powers, and not to
their own will.
These appeals were in vain, although they were made in language most
attractive, and although the sympathies of the people were sincere and
active in behalf of Hungary. His mission was a failure, inasmuch as
neither by argument, by eloquence, nor by sympathy was he able to
secure an official declaration or promise of a purpose in the national
authorities to interfere in the affairs of Continental Europe.
Pages:
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284