For many years the Irish
population of Boston had acted with the Democratic Party. Upon the
question of calling a Convention the adverse majority in Suffolk had
been 2,800 only, but upon the question of ratifying the work of the
Convention the adverse majority was nearly six thousand. To this
result the influence of Bishop Fitzpatrick had contributed essentially.
His reason he did not disguise. Portions of Boston were under the
control of the Irish. A division of the city would open to them seats
in the House and the Senate. The Bishop deprecated their entrance
into active, personal politics. Hence he used his influence against
the new Constitution. Such was his frank statement when the contest
was over.
About the twentieth of June, when I had been a member of the Convention
for twenty days only, General Banks said to me that it was the wish of
our friends that I should move for a committee to prepare the
Constitution for submission to the people. At that time the thought of
such a movement had not occurred to me. The committee was appointed
upon my motion, and, according to usage, I was placed at the head of
it, and from that time I had in my own hands, very largely, the
direction of the business of the Convention. As is usual, the work of
the committee fell upon a few members. In this case the working
members were Richard H.
Pages:
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312