They thought slavery an evil, but they had no disposition to attack it.
Alike, they feared unpleasant consequences. Choate's devotion to the
Constitution was akin to idolatry.
Cushing's support of the Constitution more nearly resembled
professional duty. Indeed, that peculiarity could be discovered in
much of his public conduct. In service to others he was liberal to a
fault. In conversation, he would make suggestions to politicians and
to lawyers in aid of their views or their causes with great freedom
and without apparent concern as to the effect upon parties or men.
Rantoul was not able to fix his attention upon any one branch of labor.
He was first of all a politician with an interest in social questions.
The profession of the law was not his mistress. His arguments were
clear and direct, but they lacked the quality that is near to genius.
This quality Choate possessed in a degree not elsewhere found in the
life or history of the American Bar. Cushing's arguments were loaded
with learning and heavy with suggestions upon the general subject
rather than upon the case. This of his law arguments. As I never saw
him before a jury I cannot speak of his quality as a _nisi prius_
advocate; but I cannot imagine that he could have had eminent success,
and certainly he could not have had success, in the later period of his
career.
Pages:
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328